questions for a new year
1. how can Arlen Spector of Pennsylvania be concerned about and against the president going outside the law to spy on american citizens, yet be stubbornly supportive of a supreme court nominee that would enshrine into law, the president's ability to do anything?
2. Why are the Log Cabin Republicans in Florida so upset that the GOP is funding the anti gay marriage initiative. Seems to me that they are partially responsible for supporting the folks who are advocating this course. It may sound a bit perverse, but they sort of sound like 'jews for hitler'.
3. How can gay Catholics still stay Catholic considering that the Catholic church thinks they are sick and 'disordered'?
4. How can the democrats, faced with a supreme court nominee that has such a clear paper trail showing his disdain for individual rights and the right to choose, and has shown over and over again in his testimony that he will evade answering any specific questions, be so inept at being able to make that case?
5. in conjunction with this, after giving the conservatives every court appointment they wanted in exchange for saving the judicial filibuster for an important candidate, refuse to even use it when the confirmation of this man would irrevocably turn the court so far to the right that civil rights in this country are in jeapardy for the next generation?
2. Why are the Log Cabin Republicans in Florida so upset that the GOP is funding the anti gay marriage initiative. Seems to me that they are partially responsible for supporting the folks who are advocating this course. It may sound a bit perverse, but they sort of sound like 'jews for hitler'.
3. How can gay Catholics still stay Catholic considering that the Catholic church thinks they are sick and 'disordered'?
4. How can the democrats, faced with a supreme court nominee that has such a clear paper trail showing his disdain for individual rights and the right to choose, and has shown over and over again in his testimony that he will evade answering any specific questions, be so inept at being able to make that case?
5. in conjunction with this, after giving the conservatives every court appointment they wanted in exchange for saving the judicial filibuster for an important candidate, refuse to even use it when the confirmation of this man would irrevocably turn the court so far to the right that civil rights in this country are in jeapardy for the next generation?
posted by junesxing at 7:05 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home